DokMine
Use the document. Not the personal data.
DokMine finds emails, phone numbers, URLs, IDs and names across PDFs, Office files, emails and images — then hands the file back redacted, in its original format. A redacted .docx is still a .docx. It runs OCR on scans and on screenshots embedded inside documents, so text hidden in images gets caught too. Extraction mode lets you just see what a document exposes. Free tier, no card required. Automated detection isn't exhaustive, so always review a file before sharing it.
Features
Format-preserving redaction. A redacted .docx comes back as a .docx, .xlsx as .xlsx, .pdf as .pdf. Layout, styling and structure stay intact, with no flattening to plain text.
Use Cases
Before you send a document to someone outside your team. Contracts, reports and exports often carry contact details you didn't intend to share. Run the file through first and see what's actually in it.
Comments
DokMine has great potential! A few improvements could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions. WhatsApp: https://wa.me/447307349530 Telegram: t.me/rforrank
The manual redaction burden is real - especially when teams collaborate on docs with mixed sensitive content. Keeping the original format (docx, pdf) while stripping PII is a massive time saver compared to sending files back and forth for approval. Format preservation is key here since exports often look broken after manual redaction.
The format-preserving part is what would actually make me use this. I've had redaction workflows where the .docx came back flattened and the layout was gone, which meant rebuilding the document anyway. One question about the review step: since you note detection isn't exhaustive, does extraction mode show confidence per match, or flag the spots it's unsure about? If a human has to re-read the whole document anyway the time saving shrinks — but if it can say "these three areas are ambiguous," the review becomes targeted. Also curious how the OCR holds up on rotated or low-contrast screenshots, since that tends to be where it breaks.
Premium Products
Sponsors
Buy
Makers
Makers
Comments
DokMine has great potential! A few improvements could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions. WhatsApp: https://wa.me/447307349530 Telegram: t.me/rforrank
The manual redaction burden is real - especially when teams collaborate on docs with mixed sensitive content. Keeping the original format (docx, pdf) while stripping PII is a massive time saver compared to sending files back and forth for approval. Format preservation is key here since exports often look broken after manual redaction.
The format-preserving part is what would actually make me use this. I've had redaction workflows where the .docx came back flattened and the layout was gone, which meant rebuilding the document anyway. One question about the review step: since you note detection isn't exhaustive, does extraction mode show confidence per match, or flag the spots it's unsure about? If a human has to re-read the whole document anyway the time saving shrinks — but if it can say "these three areas are ambiguous," the review becomes targeted. Also curious how the OCR holds up on rotated or low-contrast screenshots, since that tends to be where it breaks.
Premium Products
New to Fazier?
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved