**VoteGenerator is a free online poll and survey maker built on one constraint: neither the person creating the poll nor the people answering it should need an account.**
Type a question, add options, share a link. No signup, no email, no app. Works on any device.
## What it does
**Eight poll types**
- Multiple choice, single or multi-select
- Ranked choice with instant-runoff counting, showing every elimination round
- This-or-that head-to-head comparison
- Meeting scheduling across time slots
- Rating scales — 1 to 5 with star, heart, thumb, fire or smiley icons, across multiple aspects
- RSVP attendance tracking
- Image polls
- Multi-question surveys with configurable 0–10 and 1–10 numeric scales
**Automatic NPS scoring.** A 0–10 question segments responses into Promoters, Passives and Detractors and calculates the score.
**120+ editable templates** across HR, customer feedback, education, events, healthcare, property, community and procurement.
**Native Slack app** — slash commands, voting inside the message with results updating in place, AI poll generation from a plain-language description, and recurring polls that post themselves on a timezone-aware schedule so a Monday pulse fires at 9am in each person's own local time.
**Server-side anonymity.** Anonymous Mode is opt-in per poll and enforced on the backend rather than hidden in the UI. When enabled, device type, country, region and referrer are never collected — not collected and hidden — and timestamps are stored as dates, so responses can't be re-identified by arrival order.
**Sharing** by link, downloadable QR code, or iframe embed. Results update in real time.
## What it isn't
Not a live-presentation tool — no word clouds or projector mode, so Poll Everywhere and Mentimeter fit that better. No skip logic or cross-tabulation, so it won't replace a research platform. And not built for legally binding elections; for board votes or union ballots, use a purpose-built platform.
## Pricing
**Free forever** — 3 active polls, 100 responses each, all 8 poll types, 30-day duration. No credit card, no trial. No ads. No signup. No registration.
**Pro $19/month** — 10,000 responses per poll, unlimited polls, CSV export, custom short links, one-year duration. $19/month billed monthly · $16/month billed annually ($190/year)
**Business $49/month** — 100,000 responses, white-label embeds, single-use access codes, domain restriction. $49/month billed monthly · $41/month billed annually ($490/year)
Flat per account, not per seat. No per-response overage charges. No ads on any plan.
Features
- No signup for anyone — create a poll or survey and collect responses without you or your respondents making an account
- 8 poll types — multiple choice, ranked choice with instant-runoff counting, this-or-that, meeting scheduling, rating scales, RSVP tracking, image polls, and multi-question surveys
- Ranked-choice voting free — every elimination round shown, so you can see how the winner was reached
- 120+ editable templates — HR, customer feedback, education, events, healthcare, property, community and procurement
- Rating scales and NPS — 1-5 with star, heart, thumb, fire or smiley icons across multiple aspects, plus configurable 0-10 scales with automatic Promoter/Passive/Detractor scoring
- Slack app — create polls with a slash command, vote inside the message, and schedule recurring polls on a timezone-aware schedule
- Anonymous Mode — opt-in per poll and enforced server-side: device, country, region and referrer are never collected, and timestamps are stored as dates
- Real-time results — live dashboard as responses arrive, shareable and embeddable
- Share by link, QR code or website embed
- CSV export on paid plans; white-label embeds, single-use access codes and domain restriction on Business
- No ads on any plan, including free
Use Cases
- Team decisions — picking between options where a single-choice vote would split the room. Ranked choice finds the option with real support.
- Meeting scheduling — find a time that works across a group without a separate scheduling subscription.
- Employee surveys — engagement, satisfaction, weekly pulse, exit interviews and 360 feedback, with anonymity enforced on the server rather than just hidden in the interface.
- Customer feedback — CSAT and NPS with the score calculated automatically, collected by link or QR code after a purchase or appointment.
- Service ratings in person — QR code on a receipt, table card or counter, rating several aspects in one question.
- Classroom polls — teachers polling students with no logins, accounts or school email required.
- Event planning — RSVP tracking, date coordination, potluck signups and post-event feedback.
- Community and volunteer groups — member surveys, committee votes and availability checks where nobody should have to register.
Fazier Deal
Comments
This started because I wanted to survey a team and every tool I looked at wanted an email, a signup, an account. All that friction for one question. So I spent the past year building the version I actually wanted. No signup, no email collection, no registration, no ads on any plan including the free one. You make a poll, share a link, and nobody has to create anything. Not you, not the people answering. Everyone tells me I need to collect emails for this to work and they're probably right. But I get enough email already and I didn't want to be another thing in someone's inbox. The other reason it exists is that group votes keep landing on options most of the group didn't want. I simulated 660,000 votes to see how often that happens and with five options on the ballot the winner has no real majority 84% of the time. Ranked choice fixes it and it's free here. Solo founder, bootstrapped, no investors. Would love to hear what's missing.
This is a pretty cool setup, especially for quick group decisions where nobody wants to make another account just to vote. I also like that ranked choice is included instead of forcing everything into a basic yes/no poll. I’m curious about one thing though: when a ranked-choice vote ends in a really close result or tie, how does VoteGenerator handle it? That’s something I’d want to know before using it for a bigger group. I’ve also been playing around with decision-making tools like https://decidal.com/, so I’m always interested in seeing different approaches to group decisions.
Showing every elimination round in the ranked-choice results is the right call - instant-runoff outcomes look arbitrary until you can see where the votes moved. The anonymity design is the other thing worth pointing at: enforcing it on the backend and storing timestamps as dates is a materially different promise from hiding fields in the UI. With no signup on either side, how is ballot stuffing handled - rate limiting, or something else?
No signup for the creator *or* the respondents is the actual product. Ranked-choice with every elimination round visible, plus server-side anonymity (dates not timestamps, no device/geo), is a much more serious poll tool than the 30-second pitch suggests. Slack recurring pulses that fire at 9am in each person's timezone is the one
VoteGenerator Your product has strong potential, but I found a few key improvements that could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions—please contact me at [email protected].
So I spent the past year building the version I actually wanted. No signup, no email collection, no registration, no ads on any plan including the free one. You make a poll, share a link, and nobody has to create anything. Not you, not the people answering. Everyone tells me I need to collect emails for this to work and they're probably right. But I get enough email already and I didn't want to be another thing in someone's inbox.
The no-signup constraint here is brilliant. Most survey tools kill their own response rates by requiring email or account creation - that friction alone drops participation by 70-80% in my experience. The fact that you can share a link and get responses immediately removes the biggest bottleneck in getting feedback loops working. I've used traditional tools where setting up a survey took longer than writing the questions, then half the invitees never participated because friction. The ranked choice with runoff counting is particularly clever for team decisions. When picking between options, ranked voting actually surfaces the true consensus better than simple plurality. Five options, each person ranks them, and you can see which option has no real opposition versus which one is polarizing. That's genuinely useful data that most survey tools don't capture. Server-side anonymity plus Slack integration solves another real problem: people won't give honest feedback in tools tied to their identity or email. The ability to survey a team on something sensitive and have responses stay anonymous changes what people will actually tell you. This feels like one of those tools that seems simple on the surface but actually reflects a lot of thought about what makes feedback systems actually work.
Premium Products
Fazier Deal
Sponsors
Buy
Awards
View all
Awards
View allMakers
Makers
Comments
This started because I wanted to survey a team and every tool I looked at wanted an email, a signup, an account. All that friction for one question. So I spent the past year building the version I actually wanted. No signup, no email collection, no registration, no ads on any plan including the free one. You make a poll, share a link, and nobody has to create anything. Not you, not the people answering. Everyone tells me I need to collect emails for this to work and they're probably right. But I get enough email already and I didn't want to be another thing in someone's inbox. The other reason it exists is that group votes keep landing on options most of the group didn't want. I simulated 660,000 votes to see how often that happens and with five options on the ballot the winner has no real majority 84% of the time. Ranked choice fixes it and it's free here. Solo founder, bootstrapped, no investors. Would love to hear what's missing.
This is a pretty cool setup, especially for quick group decisions where nobody wants to make another account just to vote. I also like that ranked choice is included instead of forcing everything into a basic yes/no poll. I’m curious about one thing though: when a ranked-choice vote ends in a really close result or tie, how does VoteGenerator handle it? That’s something I’d want to know before using it for a bigger group. I’ve also been playing around with decision-making tools like https://decidal.com/, so I’m always interested in seeing different approaches to group decisions.
Showing every elimination round in the ranked-choice results is the right call - instant-runoff outcomes look arbitrary until you can see where the votes moved. The anonymity design is the other thing worth pointing at: enforcing it on the backend and storing timestamps as dates is a materially different promise from hiding fields in the UI. With no signup on either side, how is ballot stuffing handled - rate limiting, or something else?
No signup for the creator *or* the respondents is the actual product. Ranked-choice with every elimination round visible, plus server-side anonymity (dates not timestamps, no device/geo), is a much more serious poll tool than the 30-second pitch suggests. Slack recurring pulses that fire at 9am in each person's timezone is the one
VoteGenerator Your product has strong potential, but I found a few key improvements that could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions—please contact me at [email protected].
So I spent the past year building the version I actually wanted. No signup, no email collection, no registration, no ads on any plan including the free one. You make a poll, share a link, and nobody has to create anything. Not you, not the people answering. Everyone tells me I need to collect emails for this to work and they're probably right. But I get enough email already and I didn't want to be another thing in someone's inbox.
The no-signup constraint here is brilliant. Most survey tools kill their own response rates by requiring email or account creation - that friction alone drops participation by 70-80% in my experience. The fact that you can share a link and get responses immediately removes the biggest bottleneck in getting feedback loops working. I've used traditional tools where setting up a survey took longer than writing the questions, then half the invitees never participated because friction. The ranked choice with runoff counting is particularly clever for team decisions. When picking between options, ranked voting actually surfaces the true consensus better than simple plurality. Five options, each person ranks them, and you can see which option has no real opposition versus which one is polarizing. That's genuinely useful data that most survey tools don't capture. Server-side anonymity plus Slack integration solves another real problem: people won't give honest feedback in tools tied to their identity or email. The ability to survey a team on something sensitive and have responses stay anonymous changes what people will actually tell you. This feels like one of those tools that seems simple on the surface but actually reflects a lot of thought about what makes feedback systems actually work.
Premium Products
New to Fazier?
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved