RepoRanker
Get real code reviews from real developers
Get real code reviews from developers who actually use GitHub. Submit your open-source repo, earn credits by reviewing others, and use those credits to boost your project's visibility. Reviews require 800+ characters and GitHub authentication — no spam, no drive-bys. The ranking algorithm is fully transparent, published for anyone to audit.
Features
- Submit any open-source GitHub repository for free
- GitHub OAuth only — every reviewer is a verified developer
- Earn 10 credits per approved review
- Spend credits on visibility boosts starting at $2
- 800-character minimum review requirement — quality enforced
- Published, transparent ranking algorithm
- Maintainer dispute window — flag bad reviews within 48 hours
- No self-reviews allowed
Use Cases
- Indie developers who want feedback before a public launch
- Open-source maintainers looking to grow contributor interest
- Developers building a portfolio who want credible peer validation
- Side project builders who need an outside perspective on their code
- Teams evaluating open-source tools before adopting them
- Developers who want visibility without paying for ads
Sponsors
Buy
Comments
Hey Fazier community, I built RepoRanker because I kept running into the same problem. I'd ship an open-source project, post it somewhere, get a handful of upvotes, and walk away with zero useful feedback. Just vibes. No signal. I wanted a place where developers could get real, substantive reviews from people who actually write code. Not stars. Not likes. Actual written feedback with accountability behind it. So I built the credit economy around that idea. You earn credits by reviewing others. You spend them on visibility. The people most invested in quality are the ones with the most influence on the platform. That felt right. The ranking algorithm is fully public. You can read exactly how scores are calculated. No black box, no pay-to-win beyond small visibility boosts. Still early days. Would love to know what you think — what's missing, what's confusing, what you'd use it for. Drop a comment or just go submit a repo and tell me how it feels. Thanks for checking it out. Jay
Premium Products
Sponsors
Buy
Makers
Makers
Comments
Hey Fazier community, I built RepoRanker because I kept running into the same problem. I'd ship an open-source project, post it somewhere, get a handful of upvotes, and walk away with zero useful feedback. Just vibes. No signal. I wanted a place where developers could get real, substantive reviews from people who actually write code. Not stars. Not likes. Actual written feedback with accountability behind it. So I built the credit economy around that idea. You earn credits by reviewing others. You spend them on visibility. The people most invested in quality are the ones with the most influence on the platform. That felt right. The ranking algorithm is fully public. You can read exactly how scores are calculated. No black box, no pay-to-win beyond small visibility boosts. Still early days. Would love to know what you think — what's missing, what's confusing, what you'd use it for. Drop a comment or just go submit a repo and tell me how it feels. Thanks for checking it out. Jay
Premium Products
New to Fazier?
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved