RankAgent

The honest origin is that I wanted good SEO for my own thing and couldn't justify ₹15,000–50,000 a month for it. so i did what everyone does and used the tools instead. Every one of them handed me the same artifact: a list of what was wrong, colour-coded, and then nothing. the part that takes actual time — writing the title tag, working out the schema, deciding what matters first — was still entirely mine. That gap is the whole product. RankAgent crawls the site, scores it in language a normal person can read, and then writes the fix for each issue. paste it in, or on WordPress let it push the change. Two things surprised me along the way. first, the buyer. i built it for small business owners and the people who actually showed up were freelancers and two-person agencies who needed to do this across ten client sites and hand something branded to each of them. so it became the system they run that work on rather than a tool they check. Second, AI search moved faster than i expected. clients started asking 'are we in ChatGPT?' before they asked about Google rankings, so there's a whole GEO side now: whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and AI Overviews name you, who they name instead, and the technical work that changes it. agencies bill for that audit, which was not in the plan. What i won't claim: nobody can guarantee an AI engine will cite you. I guarantee the readiness work and the site's technical state, never the citation. If you try it, the thing I'd most like feedback on is whether the fixes read as usable to someone who isn't technical.