What makes it different:
- All 156 directories hand-verified, not auto-scraped
- DR scores included so you know which backlinks actually move the needle
- Dofollow vs nofollow flagged on each entry
- One-click visit, no signup required
Find high-DR directories to submit your startup
Build backlinks from free and freemium launch directories
Filter directories by niche, pricing, and link type
Save time researching where to launch a SaaS product
Discover distribution channels for indie makers and founders

The dofollow/nofollow flag per entry is the part most directory lists skip, and honestly it's the biggest time-saver here — I've wasted hours submitting to 'dofollow' directories that turned out nofollow on the free tier. Two genuine questions: does the DR get refreshed on the weekly update, and do you flag which directories require a reciprocal badge vs a plain submission? That last distinction really changes how you prioritize where to spend effort.
Just did a manual round of directory submissions and the real pain was exactly this — no way to tell which lists are worth it vs. dead or spammy. Sorting 156 of them by domain rating is the right call. One thing I'd kill for: a flag for which ones require a reciprocal back-link, since that's the other big time-sink. Useful tool.
The DR + dofollow flag combo is what makes this actually usable, most lists give you neither. If you're adding fields, the one I'd value next is "real cost to list": queue length and whether the free tier is gated behind comments or a reciprocal badge. Two directories at the same DR can be 10 minutes vs two weeks of work apart.
this is painfully well-timed. i spent today doing exactly this manually — went through a list of "free" directories from blog posts and hit paywall after paywall: half the big-name directories have quietly gone paid or removed self-serve submission entirely, and the listicles recommending them are months out of date. "updated weekly" + a pricing filter is the entire value right there, the directory landscape changes faster than any static list can track. one suggestion: a "last verified free" date per entry would build a lot of trust — that's the exact piece of information i was missing today.
This is genuinely useful timing — I'm in the middle of doing directory submissions for my own launch and was manually collecting these from scattered blog posts. Sorting by domain rating is the right call since that's the only column that actually matters for SEO value. Does the list flag which ones are dofollow vs nofollow?


The dofollow/nofollow flag per entry is the part most directory lists skip, and honestly it's the biggest time-saver here — I've wasted hours submitting to 'dofollow' directories that turned out nofollow on the free tier. Two genuine questions: does the DR get refreshed on the weekly update, and do you flag which directories require a reciprocal badge vs a plain submission? That last distinction really changes how you prioritize where to spend effort.
Just did a manual round of directory submissions and the real pain was exactly this — no way to tell which lists are worth it vs. dead or spammy. Sorting 156 of them by domain rating is the right call. One thing I'd kill for: a flag for which ones require a reciprocal back-link, since that's the other big time-sink. Useful tool.
The DR + dofollow flag combo is what makes this actually usable, most lists give you neither. If you're adding fields, the one I'd value next is "real cost to list": queue length and whether the free tier is gated behind comments or a reciprocal badge. Two directories at the same DR can be 10 minutes vs two weeks of work apart.
this is painfully well-timed. i spent today doing exactly this manually — went through a list of "free" directories from blog posts and hit paywall after paywall: half the big-name directories have quietly gone paid or removed self-serve submission entirely, and the listicles recommending them are months out of date. "updated weekly" + a pricing filter is the entire value right there, the directory landscape changes faster than any static list can track. one suggestion: a "last verified free" date per entry would build a lot of trust — that's the exact piece of information i was missing today.
This is genuinely useful timing — I'm in the middle of doing directory submissions for my own launch and was manually collecting these from scattered blog posts. Sorting by domain rating is the right call since that's the only column that actually matters for SEO value. Does the list flag which ones are dofollow vs nofollow?

Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved