Listifying helps brands submit their saas on high-DR platforms for early traffic and SEO. It takes your saas or app description like name of the saas, link, author profile pic and name, location where saas is based and pricing features along with description, tags, tagline etc.
It takes the user 5-7 minutes to fill the form, writing all the details those high-DR platforms ask for. Then, your saas is submitted manually with a dedicated email from our side. It is submitted across all the platforms which is listed on the pricing card and according to what you choose.
Once your saas/app is submitted on all the directories, we send to you a report sheet via the email you gave us while form submission wherein you get all the details of the saas listings across all platforms. You get the following - name of the directory/platform, DR, homepage link to the platform, submission url of the platform, date when it will go live, the email and password (so that you can login and see yourself), and the saas which got rejected for any reason before the report was submitted.
Listifying helps users -
Listifying is for all the founders/saas owners who are looking forward to launch their saas or want to get backlinks from high-DR websites but do not have the time to submit it manually.



The high-DR positioning is compelling, especially for small SaaS teams that need distribution but do not have time to research every directory. I like the idea of centralizing the submission details and reporting; does the workflow also flag which directories allow follow links or require ongoing updates?
Speaking as someone halfway through doing this manually this week — the report sheet with DR, live dates and login credentials per directory is the part that has real value, because the painful bit isn't the submissions, it's tracking which ones went live and which ones silently rejected you. One thing I'd want to know before paying: how do you handle the growing number of directories that have quietly moved to paid-only submission? Three of the "free" big ones I hit this week now want $99–$347 up front. Does the 100+ count include those, or only ones with a genuinely free path?
신용카드 한도 내에서 현금 유동성을 즉시 확보할 수 있는 카드깡 구조는 긴급한 지출이나 사업 자금의 일시적 부족을 빠르게 메워줍니다 https://cashing.neocities.org/

Directory submissions are one of those things founders know they should do but never actually sit down to do — the manual process across 100+ sites is genuinely tedious. Listifying solving that automatically is a great time-saver. Would be curious whether the submission report includes DA scores for each directory, so founders can prioritize which backlinks are actually moving the needle for their SEO.

Doing manual directory submissions this week and I can confirm it's exactly the grind described here — every directory wants slightly different assets and copy. The consolidated report sheet with DR and live directory URLs would be the deciding factor for me; that's the part that's hardest to track by hand.



The high-DR positioning is compelling, especially for small SaaS teams that need distribution but do not have time to research every directory. I like the idea of centralizing the submission details and reporting; does the workflow also flag which directories allow follow links or require ongoing updates?
Speaking as someone halfway through doing this manually this week — the report sheet with DR, live dates and login credentials per directory is the part that has real value, because the painful bit isn't the submissions, it's tracking which ones went live and which ones silently rejected you. One thing I'd want to know before paying: how do you handle the growing number of directories that have quietly moved to paid-only submission? Three of the "free" big ones I hit this week now want $99–$347 up front. Does the 100+ count include those, or only ones with a genuinely free path?
신용카드 한도 내에서 현금 유동성을 즉시 확보할 수 있는 카드깡 구조는 긴급한 지출이나 사업 자금의 일시적 부족을 빠르게 메워줍니다 https://cashing.neocities.org/

Directory submissions are one of those things founders know they should do but never actually sit down to do — the manual process across 100+ sites is genuinely tedious. Listifying solving that automatically is a great time-saver. Would be curious whether the submission report includes DA scores for each directory, so founders can prioritize which backlinks are actually moving the needle for their SEO.

Doing manual directory submissions this week and I can confirm it's exactly the grind described here — every directory wants slightly different assets and copy. The consolidated report sheet with DR and live directory URLs would be the deciding factor for me; that's the part that's hardest to track by hand.
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved