If you are launching a product, you know the problem: launch research eats about 40 hours, and half the 'ultimate directory lists' online link to dead sites. Launch Almanac fixes that: 84 launch channels (directories, communities, newsletters, review sites, AI/GEO listings) with costs, audience, submission requirements, ready-to-paste templates, a pre-filled tracking sheet, and a Claude Skill that drafts your submissions. Every channel was checked alive on June 10, 2026, and 7 dead directories are flagged. EUR 24 one-time, no upsells.
84 launch channels, each verified alive on June 10, 2026. 7 dead directories flagged. Costs, audience and submission requirements for every channel. Ready-to-paste submission templates. Pre-filled tracking sheet. Claude Skill that drafts submissions. Free page with the 20 best directories, no signup.
Planning a product launch without spending 40 hours on research. Choosing which directories are actually worth submitting to in 2026. Getting listed on GEO/AI-citation channels. Avoiding dead directories that free lists still recommend.

Hey everyone - Marius here. I compiled and verified this database to launch my own products, then realized the database itself was the most useful thing I had built. I fetched every launch directory I could find - 91 of them. Seven of the most-recommended ones are dead or have silently moved, and most lists circulating today still link to them. So the core of the product is just: every channel, checked by hand, with a date on the verification. This Fazier launch is itself row Fazier in my own tracking sheet. Honest feedback welcome - especially: what would make you trust a verified claim from a stranger on the internet?
A consolidated launch directory with 84 verified channels is exactly what indie founders need — the research phase before a launch is genuinely painful. Would love to know how recently the list was audited; some directories go quiet or change submission requirements frequently. Also curious if there's filtering by category or audience type.

So instead of "we will submit you everywhere, even if some directories won't bring much" it's a "you do it yourself, but you get a list directories and utilities to do it efficiently"? Actually I like the idea. Of course all this information can be researched individually, as I've decided to do, but it indeed takes a lot of time.
Thanks - glad it resonates. On audit recency: every channel was checked by hand on June 10, 2026, and that date is stamped on the product and on each row, so you always see how fresh it is; I'm re-verifying monthly and dating each pass. On filtering: the sheet tags every channel by category (directory / community / newsletter / review site / AI-GEO), cost and audience, so you can sort or filter by those in your own copy. A dedicated audience-type filter is a great idea - noting it for the next update.
Thanks for the kind words, all - genuinely appreciated. @soundbound to your point about directories going quiet or changing their submission rules: that's exactly the failure mode this is built to catch. Each row records when it was last checked by hand (June 10), I note the current submission method and requirements per channel, and I re-verify monthly - so when a directory dies or moves its form, the row reflects it instead of silently rotting like most lists. The 7 dead ones I flagged rather than deleted are the proof that pass actually ran. @Jordan @Raibek @Welsenes thanks for the support - and if any channel looks off when you use it, tell me and I'll fix the row.
Thanks so much for all the feedback here, genuinely helpful. A few replies: @Przemek you've got it exactly - it's not "we'll submit you everywhere", it's "here's every channel that's actually alive, with the cost, audience and requirements plus paste-ready templates", so doing it yourself takes hours instead of weeks. @Trajekt Team the audience-fit filter (SaaS / education / AI tools / career) is now top of my list - the sheet already tags category + audience per row, so it's the natural next step. @Team CtrlOps flagging the 7 dead directories instead of quietly deleting them is exactly meant to prove the verification happened - glad that landed. @David good luck with your own launch, and if any channel in the list has changed since June 10 just tell me and I'll fix the row. Thanks again everyone.

Hey everyone - Marius here. I compiled and verified this database to launch my own products, then realized the database itself was the most useful thing I had built. I fetched every launch directory I could find - 91 of them. Seven of the most-recommended ones are dead or have silently moved, and most lists circulating today still link to them. So the core of the product is just: every channel, checked by hand, with a date on the verification. This Fazier launch is itself row Fazier in my own tracking sheet. Honest feedback welcome - especially: what would make you trust a verified claim from a stranger on the internet?
A consolidated launch directory with 84 verified channels is exactly what indie founders need — the research phase before a launch is genuinely painful. Would love to know how recently the list was audited; some directories go quiet or change submission requirements frequently. Also curious if there's filtering by category or audience type.

So instead of "we will submit you everywhere, even if some directories won't bring much" it's a "you do it yourself, but you get a list directories and utilities to do it efficiently"? Actually I like the idea. Of course all this information can be researched individually, as I've decided to do, but it indeed takes a lot of time.
Thanks - glad it resonates. On audit recency: every channel was checked by hand on June 10, 2026, and that date is stamped on the product and on each row, so you always see how fresh it is; I'm re-verifying monthly and dating each pass. On filtering: the sheet tags every channel by category (directory / community / newsletter / review site / AI-GEO), cost and audience, so you can sort or filter by those in your own copy. A dedicated audience-type filter is a great idea - noting it for the next update.
Thanks for the kind words, all - genuinely appreciated. @soundbound to your point about directories going quiet or changing their submission rules: that's exactly the failure mode this is built to catch. Each row records when it was last checked by hand (June 10), I note the current submission method and requirements per channel, and I re-verify monthly - so when a directory dies or moves its form, the row reflects it instead of silently rotting like most lists. The 7 dead ones I flagged rather than deleted are the proof that pass actually ran. @Jordan @Raibek @Welsenes thanks for the support - and if any channel looks off when you use it, tell me and I'll fix the row.
Thanks so much for all the feedback here, genuinely helpful. A few replies: @Przemek you've got it exactly - it's not "we'll submit you everywhere", it's "here's every channel that's actually alive, with the cost, audience and requirements plus paste-ready templates", so doing it yourself takes hours instead of weeks. @Trajekt Team the audience-fit filter (SaaS / education / AI tools / career) is now top of my list - the sheet already tags category + audience per row, so it's the natural next step. @Team CtrlOps flagging the 7 dead directories instead of quietly deleting them is exactly meant to prove the verification happened - glad that landed. @David good luck with your own launch, and if any channel in the list has changed since June 10 just tell me and I'll fix the row. Thanks again everyone.
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved