Gixo Arc

The proposal gap usually lives between research and client sync - you have source material scattered across documents, slack threads, and emails. Getting it into a single shareable format where the whole team can comment before pitching is the bottleneck. Automation here means less time assembling and more time refining the actual strategy.

A lot of RFP packets also include the buyer's draft MSA or terms, with things like a liability cap, IP ownership or payment terms. Does the compliance check catch a proposal that commits to something those terms contradict (say, fixed-price scope against a T&M clause), or does it only check against the requirements list?

The requirement-to-evidence mapping is the feature I would test first. In agency proposals the painful part is not writing the executive summary, it is proving later that a line in the scope was answered by a specific page of the RFP packet when the client disputes it. Does the export keep those source references (file and section) next to each requirement in the DOCX, or do they stay inside the workspace? Also, when the client changes scope after the proposal is accepted, can a revision be generated from the same sources so the delta is visible, rather than regenerating the whole document?