Echo

The big Vercel image needs some tuning

Loved the UI - Pretty cool!

Loved the UI - Pretty cool!

Loved the UI - Pretty cool!

The concept of an automated 'red team' for decision-making is brilliant. How do you handle the synthesis. does it weigh specific expert credentials more heavily depending on the topic, or is it a flat consensus?

I love this to help refine ideas and get only the best feedback out.

Wow... this is genuinely fun and I did some good thinking. Thanks for letting me use this for free. I often find myself doing this manually with claude or GPT, so it's nice to have a place where the specific point is that.

Great app, used it and got a good answers from the experts

Can you elaborate more on the position/logic behind each of the 8 agents? Sounds overkill if you clearly only state 3 stances (For, against, conditional, etc)

hey , the ui is absolutely amazing , nice work!!

hey , the ui is absolutely amazing , nice work!!

love the clean design, and the agents discussing is a really cool idea

We built Echo because every big decision deserves more than a single AI opinion. Echo assembles 8 domain experts who argue your dilemma from every angle and deliver a clear verdict in under 30 seconds. Free, no sign-up required. Try it at goecho.io

Great idea. For me it would be interesting to know: - how are the AI domain experts setup, with what knowledge base? can I set it up myself? - what is the advantage of this product to setting up a couple of AI agents locally with given roles?

good idea.. thumb up

i always wanted to use multiple ai and import chat from let's say gemini to claude and gpt to gemini. For claude AI itself it uses lot of tokens even with pro membership , since your saying that 8 AI will debate it out , how long it will take before we run out of tokens and need to buy more?

Interesting concept — the structured “FOR / AGAINST / CONDITIONAL” debate is the real differentiator here, not just multiple AIs. Would be great to see how customizable the experts are over time.

The multi-expert debate format is a smart way to surface blind spots in decision-making. Having structured FOR/AGAINST positions adds accountability you don't get from a single AI. Would love to see domain-specific weighting of experts in the future.

it's like demon on your left shoulder and angel on your right shoulder judging you

looks cool, would defenitly recommend

The structured FOR/AGAINST/CONDITIONAL verdict format is genuinely useful for startup decisions where the nuance gets lost in back-and-forth discussion. Having 8 domain experts synthesize in 30 seconds removes the bottleneck of assembling the right people. Would love to know how the expert pool is curated and whether users can tune the domain weighting for their specific context.

Looks like an great AI decision engine

the important question is can human emotions accept the outcome.. good initiative

Love it, continue!!!

Great timing on this launch — the market for developer productivity tools is really maturing right now. The core workflow approach here makes a lot of sense for teams dealing with context-switching overhead.

Sounds interesting! Nice tool for research and education purposes.

I think that this is a really good idea, i like how it uses multiple AI's rather than one so that it is completely unbiased.

Great timing on this launch — the market for developer productivity tools is really maturing right now. The core workflow approach here makes a lot of sense for teams dealing with context-switching overhead.

Cool concept. Never thought about getting multiple AI perspectives before making a decision on a single platform is a thing I might need.

The idea of getting structured FOR/AGAINST verdicts instead of a single wishy-washy AI answer is really compelling. Most AI tools try to please you — having experts actually disagree forces you to think through the tradeoffs. Would be interesting to see this applied to product decisions too, not just personal dilemmas.

Having AI experts debate a decision before you commit is a clever way to stress-test ideas. Useful for founders making quick calls.

Really smart approach having AI experts actually disagree with each other instead of giving one safe answer. The FOR/AGAINST format forces clearer thinking about tradeoffs.

Tried it out, really cool concept. Gets straight to the point in a way most AI tools don't. Does the expert panel change based on what kind of decision you throw at it or is it always the same 8?

The design of the page feels great, looking forward to experiencing its effects