Launch
EasyInterview
Visit
Example Image

EasyInterview

Cheat-proof AI technical screens, scored on evidence

Visit

EasyInterview runs the first technical round for you. A live AI interviewer speaks with the candidate over voice, asks follow-up questions based on what they actually say rather than a fixed script, and scores the answers against evidence pulled from the transcript instead of a gut feel.

Every interview comes back with a recording, a full transcript, and a per-signal breakdown, so your engineers only spend time on the candidates worth meeting. Built for teams hiring engineers at volume who cannot staff every screening call.

Example Image
Example Image
Example Image
Example Image
Example Image

Features

Live voice AI interviewer that asks real follow-up questions

Evidence-scored results tied back to quotes from the transcript

Full recording and transcript for every interview

Adaptive questioning instead of a fixed script, so answers are hard to fake

Coding, system design and resume-grilling rounds

Shareable reports the hiring team can review async

Use Cases

Replace the first-round phone screen when you have more applicants than interviewers

Screen a large applicant pool in a day instead of over two weeks

Give every applicant the same interview, so comparisons are fair

Verify what a resume claims with a live technical conversation

Hand your engineers a shortlist with transcripts and evidence attached

Comments

I kept watching teams lose whole weeks to first-round technical screens and then reject most of the people they spoke to anyway. So we built the round itself rather than more scheduling around it: a live AI voice interviewer that follows up on what the candidate actually says, and a report that quotes the transcript behind every score instead of handing you a bare number. Would love feedback from anyone who runs technical hiring, especially on where you think an AI screen should stop and a human should take over.

Premium Products

Comments

I kept watching teams lose whole weeks to first-round technical screens and then reject most of the people they spoke to anyway. So we built the round itself rather than more scheduling around it: a live AI voice interviewer that follows up on what the candidate actually says, and a report that quotes the transcript behind every score instead of handing you a bare number. Would love feedback from anyone who runs technical hiring, especially on where you think an AI screen should stop and a human should take over.

Premium Products