BatesKit provides secure, offline Bates numbering and production checks for legal documents. Files never leave your device.
Continuous Bates numbering across multiple files
No upload — everything stays on your device
Real text layer stamping with CropBox and rotation support
Integrated metadata, redaction, and QA checks
Legal professionals Bates numbering large productions with strict confidentiality
Solo practitioners without expensive PDF editing software
Bid and tender teams verifying submission documents


== FreeTV Garden == FreeTV Garden is a web-based live television directory that helps users discover and watch free-to-air TV channels from more than 200 countries. The platform organizes channels by country and category, including news, sports, movies, music, kids, and entertainment. == Features == * 200+ countries * 1000+ live TV channels * No signup required * Mobile, desktop & Smart TV support * Multiple language support Official website: https://freetvgarden.com
The "production checks" line is doing a lot of quiet work — what's actually in it? Specifically: does redaction strip the text layer and burn the image, and do you generate a load file (DAT/OPT with BEGBATES/ENDBATES)? Offline + real load file output would be the actual differentiator against the cloud tools, more than the numbering itself.
"Files never leave your device" is doing a lot of work in this category and it is the right call. Discovery material is exactly the kind of data where a cloud round-trip is not a performance question but a compliance one. The line I would put front and centre is real text layer stamping with CropBox and rotation support. That sounds like a footnote and it is actually the whole game — plenty of stampers write to MediaBox, and the numbers then drift or vanish once a page has a CropBox or a /Rotate that disagrees. Scanned productions are full of both. Question: when a source PDF has a CropBox offset from its MediaBox, does the stamp position against the visible crop or the underlying page? And does the numbering survive a later flatten by a third-party viewer?
Question on the redaction step, since that is where PDF tools quietly fail: does it remove the text from the content stream, or draw a black box over it? The famous leaks all came from files where the words were still selectable underneath. Same for XMP and embedded metadata after stamping - if the QA check confirms both of those in a report, that report is the feature I would put on the page, more than the numbering itself.
BatesKit Your product has strong potential, but I found a few key improvements that could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions—please contact me at [email protected].


== FreeTV Garden == FreeTV Garden is a web-based live television directory that helps users discover and watch free-to-air TV channels from more than 200 countries. The platform organizes channels by country and category, including news, sports, movies, music, kids, and entertainment. == Features == * 200+ countries * 1000+ live TV channels * No signup required * Mobile, desktop & Smart TV support * Multiple language support Official website: https://freetvgarden.com
The "production checks" line is doing a lot of quiet work — what's actually in it? Specifically: does redaction strip the text layer and burn the image, and do you generate a load file (DAT/OPT with BEGBATES/ENDBATES)? Offline + real load file output would be the actual differentiator against the cloud tools, more than the numbering itself.
"Files never leave your device" is doing a lot of work in this category and it is the right call. Discovery material is exactly the kind of data where a cloud round-trip is not a performance question but a compliance one. The line I would put front and centre is real text layer stamping with CropBox and rotation support. That sounds like a footnote and it is actually the whole game — plenty of stampers write to MediaBox, and the numbers then drift or vanish once a page has a CropBox or a /Rotate that disagrees. Scanned productions are full of both. Question: when a source PDF has a CropBox offset from its MediaBox, does the stamp position against the visible crop or the underlying page? And does the numbering survive a later flatten by a third-party viewer?
Question on the redaction step, since that is where PDF tools quietly fail: does it remove the text from the content stream, or draw a black box over it? The famous leaks all came from files where the words were still selectable underneath. Same for XMP and embedded metadata after stamping - if the QA check confirms both of those in a report, that report is the feature I would put on the page, more than the numbering itself.
BatesKit Your product has strong potential, but I found a few key improvements that could make it even better. I'd love to share my feedback and suggestions—please contact me at [email protected].
Find your next favorite product or submit your own. Made by @FalakDigital.
Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved