a11ytest.ai

Accessibility testing that goes beyond a checkbox is a compelling promise. I like that the positioning is clear for teams who need actionable findings, not just generic compliance reports. Curious how you balance automated checks with developer workflow speed.

Teams usually fail a11y not from missing one WCAG line but from regressions on every release. A workflow that runs in CI and maps failures to specific components (not just the URL) would be worth a paid tier if you can connect to Git providers.

Accessibility is something many give too little focus. Its good to see more apps in this space being developed.

It’s useful to see accessibility testing framed as part of the normal QA workflow instead of a separate compliance chore. The Jira/ADO handoff and CI scan support feel especially practical for engineering teams that want issues to land where work already happens. I’d be interested to know how you reduce noisy results on complex component-based apps so teams can focus on the most actionable fixes first.

This is exactly what dev teams need—accessibility finally built into the workflow, not an afterthought.

Bringing a11y directly into the QA workflow (with Jira/ADO export) tackles the exact friction point that usually pushes accessibility to "later". Curious how the scanner handles SPAs with heavy dynamic content, async modals and client-side re-renders, since those are where traditional scanners tend to miss real issues.